Pupil premium strategy statement 2024/25
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
Detail |
Data |
School name |
Moat Community College |
Number of pupils in school |
1082 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
35.2% (29.7% last year) |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2022 - 2025 |
Date this statement was published |
November 2024 |
Date on which it will be reviewed |
July 2025 |
Statement authorised by |
Brian Killeen, Principal |
Pupil premium lead |
Jo Higham, Vice Principal |
Governor / Trustee lead |
Jo Hollings, Chair of Governors |
Funding overview
Detail |
Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£375,900 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year |
£375,900 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
Moat Community College is firmly committed to ensuring equality in education and providing equal access to opportunities for all students, irrespective of their backgrounds. Pupil premium funding will be used to provide additional educational and pastoral support to improve the outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. The funding will be used to reduce the difference between the achievement of pupil premium students and others.
To ensure that our spending is as effective as possible we will use a tiered approach; targeting spending in teaching, academic and pastoral support support and making use of wider support.
The key strategies we have identified to enable pupil premium students to overcome barriers to learning include; the need to ensure the provision of high quality teaching, the targeting of academic support for pupil premium students; the close monitoring of the attendance of pupil premium students and improving this attendance; to ensure that behaviour and attitudes to learning are good and are in keeping with our high aspirations for all and to provide emotional and pastoral support for pupil premium students.
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
1 |
High quality teaching for all: 2019 Progress 8 for disadvantaged students was 0.37 below other students. The number of GCSE grades 9-5 were 8% lower than for other students. |
2 |
Academic support: Disadvantaged students have historically attended fewer intervention sessions than their peers. Learning support assistants (LSAs) are timetabled to support classes, but have not been previously deployed to include all disadvantaged students with support. |
3 |
Attendance: Data indicates that the attendance of disadvantaged students is 2% overall below that of non-disadvantaged students. In some year groups the difference is a much as 4%. |
4 |
Behaviour: Some disadvantaged students need additional support to ensure their behaviour and attitudes to learning allow them to make effective progress. Suspensions and internal exclusions are disproportionately higher for disadvantaged students than their peers. Proportion of disadvantaged external exclusions = 40%. Proportion of disadvantaged external exclusions = 38%. |
Emotional and pastoral support: Disadvantaged students have disproportionally shown a higher number of emotional and pastoral needs than other students. |
|
6 |
Reading: At the start of Year 7 in 2022/23, 56% of disadvantaged students had a reading age of 11 years, compared to 63% non-disadvantaged. |
Intended outcomes
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
|
Progress 8 for disadvantaged students in 2024/2025 will be no more than 0.25 below other students. Progress 8 for disadvantaged students in 2024/2025 will be no more than 0.20 below other students. Continue to close the gap for GCSE grades 9-5 in English and Maths between disadvantaged and other students in 2024/2025
|
|
Attendance of disadvantaged students in intervention sessions is at least as high as other students.
LSAs support at least 40% disadvantaged students in lessons.
|
3. Improved attendance. |
The gap between the attendance of disadvantaged and other students will be no more than 1.5% in 2024/25
|
4. Reduced number of external and internal exclusions for disadvantaged students.
|
The proportion of the total number of the external exclusions from the school in 2024/25 will be less than 35%.
The proportion of the total number of the internal exclusions in the school in 2024/25 will be less than 35%.
|
5. Increased number of disadvantaged students who access counselling and other support.
|
Disadvantaged students will take up at least 50% of counsellor appointments in 2024/2025,
|
6. Improved percentage of 11+ years reading ages for Year 8 disadvantaged students, to be in line with non-disadvantaged.
|
The proportion of disadvantaged students with 11+ years reading ages will be 80% in 2024/25. |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £175,900
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Teaching and Learning focusses on evidence-based strategies to support high quality teaching for all. |
Leaders of more successful schools emphasise the importance of ‘quality teaching first’. Supporting the Attainment of Disadvantaged Pupils (DFE, 2015)
Learning styles, Feedback and Mastery Learning. The Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) toolkit (2022) |
1 |
Additional English and mathematics teaching staff are supporting the curriculum and enabling tuition in small groups where needs are identified. |
The EEF toolkit (2022) suggests that that such learning approaches can have a high impact. |
1, 2 |
Teaching and Learning and Literacy teams are supported with TLRs. Teaching and Learning and the development of reading skills across the curriculum are key school foci. |
‘Quality teaching is the most important lever schools have to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils’ The EEF toolkit (2021)
The EEF toolkit (2022) also recognises that the development of reading skills and reading comprehension strategies have a ‘high impact’ on pupil outcomes
|
1,6 |
High quality CPD and the sharing of good practice. |
High quality CPD for teachers has a significant effect on pupils’ learning outcomes. Education in England: Annual Report 2020 – The Education Policy Institute |
1 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £ 100,000
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
‘Lesson 7’ Intervention sessions) for Year 11 pupils. Intervention lessons for targeted groups in all other years. |
Targeted academic support is used by successful schools to improve outcomes of disadvantaged pupils. The EEF Guide to the Pupil Premium (2021)
Small group tuition has an average impact of +4 months. The EEF toolkit (2022) |
1, 2 |
Dedicated teaching assistants to support targeted interventions using data from Go4Schools. |
One to one tuition can be effective, delivering approximately +5 months’ progress. The EEF Guide to the Pupil Premium (2021) The EEF toolkit (2022) |
1,2 |
Books and revision guides provided to students as part of year 11 intervention strategy. |
Independent study, meta- cognition and self-regulation can lead to +8 months progress. Guided homework can have an impact of +5 months on progress. The EEF Guide to the Pupil Premium (2021) |
1, 2 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £ 100,000
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Pastoral/behaviour support staff to positively reinforce attitudes to learning and to reduce instances of poor behaviour. |
Behaviour interventions will improve attitudes and attendance and benefit all pupils in the classroom. The EEF toolkit (2022) |
4 |
Pastoral support staff to have dedicated time and resources to work with outside agencies to improve PP students’ attendance.
|
The Department for Education (DfE) published research in 2016 which found that: ‘Higher overall absence leads to lower attainment at KS2 and KS4’. Improving school attendance: support for schools and local authorities (DfE 2021) |
3 |
Continue with a system of rewards and incentives for improved attendance, behaviour and academic achievement. |
Social and emotional support can improve attendance, behaviour and academic achievement. The EEF toolkit (2022) |
3, 4, 5 |
Support students’ well being and mental health with counselling service four days per week. |
Social and emotional support can improve attendance, behaviour and academic achievement. The EEF toolkit (2022) |
3, 4, 5 |
Summer school for targeted Year 7 students as part of their transition to secondary school. |
Summer schools have an impact of +3 months’ progress. The EEF toolkit (2022) |
1, 3, 4, 5 |
Subsidising disadvantaged students’ participation in extracurricular activities and visits. |
Arts and other cultural involvement can have an impact of +3 months’ progress. The EEF toolkit (2022) |
1, 3 |
Total budgeted cost: £ 375,900
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2023 to 2024 academic year.
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
Progress against the criteria. |
|
Progress 8 for disadvantaged students in 2023/24 will be no more than 0.20 below other students.
Continue to close the gap for GCSE grades 9-5 in English and Maths between disadvantaged and other students in 2023/4.
|
Difference between disadvantaged students and other students was 0.069
Pupil premium students achieving grades 5-9 in Maths and English: 36.8%. Other students achieving grades 5-9 in English and Maths: 50.3%.
|
|
Attendance of disadvantaged students in intervention sessions is at least as high as other students.
LSAs support at least 40% disadvantaged students in lessons.
|
All students attended lesson 7 intervention sessions.
LSAs supported 50% disadvantaged students in lessons. |
3. Improved attendance. |
The gap between the attendance of disadvantaged and other students will be no more than 1.5% in 2023/24.
|
2023/24 Attendance: PP = 88.7% Non PP = 91.9% Difference = 3.2% |
4. Reduced number of internal exclusions for disadvantaged students.
|
The proportion of the total number of the internal exclusions in the school in 2023/24 will be less than 35%.
|
The proportion of the total number of the internal exclusions in the school in 2023/24 was 48%.
|
5. Increased number of disadvantaged students who access counselling and other support.
|
Disadvantaged students will take up at least 55% of counsellor apointments in 2023/24 |
Disadvantaged students took up 59% of counsellor appointments.
|
6. Improved percentage of 11+ years reading ages for Year 8 disadvantaged students, to be in line with non-disadvantaged.
|
The proportion of disadvantaged students with 11+ years reading ages will be 80% in 2023/24. |
The proportion of disadvantaged students with a reading age of 11+ in Year 8 was 65.1% |